DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

January 3, 1997

TO:
 

G. W. Cunningham, Technical Director

FROM:
 

R.F. Warther, M.T. Sautman

SUBJECT:
 

RFETS Activity Report for Week Ending January 3, 1997

This week's report is fairly short because most hourly workers and employees were on vacation. Two attachments are provided. Attachment 1 summarizes risk reduction achieved at RFETS during CY97. Attachment 2 contains a list of RFETS issues that the staff anticipates will require attention during CY97. Attachment 2 was developed by the site reps and cog engineer (Kasdorf). It was previously provided to the Board during the site rep visit in November 1996.

Budget. The site budget was approved at $538 million. The following pie graph represents this budget and is based on an analysis by one of the RFFO Assistant Managers. The following describes these costs:

cc: Board Members

Attachment 1

This attachment briefly lists many of the risk reduction activities completed in CY 1996. This list is not complete. Additionally, many of these activities had associated with them safety issues at the time. For example, Trenches 3 and 4 are listed here as complete. However, the Emergency Operations Center was activated at one point during the remediation of these trenches because of a concern for a U-238 release.

Attachment 2

Calendar Year 1997 Issues at RFETS

The tables that follow include a minimal set of reviews, and are not necessarily intended to be all inclusive. Two points should be made. First, the text under the header issue provides only limited information for the scope of a detailed review. It does not limit the scope of a review. Second additional issues are expected to be uncovered during the year.

Table I

Public Risk Reduction Activities

Resolution of the following issues will result in a reduction of risk to the public and environment.

Public Risk Reduction Activities

Issues Associated with Functional Area

Draining and oxalate precipitation Scheduled to complete precipitation 9/98
  1. AB and procedure development and implementation
  2. Operator training and conduct of operations
  3. Criticality controls
Review SNM Safe Storage Mission - Adequacy of material storage form at RFETS
  1. Technical basis for HSP 31.11 revision
  2. Thermal stabilization and LOI testing of Pu oxide
  3. Stabilization of oil-covered Pu metals
  4. Residue preparations and stabilization
    1. Rebaselining efforts
      1. Technical justifications of new treatment processes
      2. Impacts of new processes and EIS to 94-1 Commitments
      3. Design reviews of new processes
    2. Baseline efforts
      1. Reviews of final designs
      2. Review of new characterization data and treatment studies
      3. Review of readiness to start operations
Review SNM Safe Storage Mission - Adequacy of material storage packaging and packaging capability at RFETS
  1. Pipe component - Nuclear safety authorization to exempt pipe material from building MAR
  2. 3013 containers
    1. Review test data for compliance with 3013
    2. Review steady state temperature for package system
  3. Plutonium Stabilization and Packaging System
    1. PuSAP design and throughput
    2. J Module preparations and PuSAP installation
    3. Operator training and readiness to begin operations
Review SNM Safe Storage Mission - Adequacy of material storage facilities at RFETS The focus of the reviews should include prevention or mitigation of release following fire or natural phenomena
  1. B371 Upgrades
  2. ISV design
  3. TRU and LLW storage facilities (the following is a minimum set)
    1. B440
    2. B664
    3. Centralized Waste Storage Facility (906)
  4. Thorough "ORR-type review" of readiness of B371 or ISV to store material
    1. Fire Protection program
    2. Con Ops program
    3. Training
    4. Maintenance of safety systems
Reduce hazards at RFETS - Transfer material to other locations
  1. Pits to Pantex (and labs)
  2. eU hemishells to Oak Ridge
  3. Metal and oxide (and scrub alloy) to SRS
  4. TRU to WIPP

Table II
Worker Risk Reduction Activities

These issues are generally activity-based, and not specific to a building. Over the next year, most of these activities are expected to occur in Buildings 886, 779 and 771 . Resolution of the following issues will result in a significant reduction of risk to the worker over the long term. In the short term, worker risk may increase as a result of the activities.

Worker Risk Reduction Activity/Issue

Issues Associated with Functional Area

Develop/review end points criteria

 

Review building characterization efforts, including SNM survey effectiveness and rigor

 

Evaluate procedures to remove SNM holdup

  1. SNM removal from holdup areas (e.g., filters, elbows, machining equipment
  2. Tap & drain AB

Glove box deactivation activity

  1. AB and procedure issues
  2. Concept of activity AB - an AB that would be mobile among buildings
  3. Stripout and size reduction issues

Tank removal activity (including raschig rings)

  1. AB for tank removal activity
  2. Disposal

Table III
Miscellaneous Issues for Review

These issues generally are related to specific functional areas of the safety envelope or authorization basis for the operation or activity. They generally are cross-cutting issues that probably affect the activities or facilities listed in the preceding tables.

Risk Reduction Activity/Issue

Issues Associated with Functional Area

Criticality Program

  1. Criticality work backlog and impacts on risk reduction activities
  2. Methodology to establish controls, including conformance to ANSI stds
  3. Effectiveness of CSO

Recommendation 95-2 and Authorization Basis

  1. AA for B771 BFO scheduled for signature 3/97.
  2. AA for B371 BIO scheduled for signature 6/97.
  3. Ensure documents and implementation are adequate, including inclusion of worker protection controls into procedures or other agreement documents.
  4. Review ACEs and other AB documents TBD (e.g., 707?)
  5. Implementation of standards and maintenance of infrastructure programs supporting implementation

Ventilation Review

Follow-up from previous reviews on the ventilation system.
Follow-up on paper/issues developed by DOE-HQ

Facility Rep Program

Evaluate effectiveness, integration with balance of RFFO

RFFO Qualification Program

 

Shift Manager and STA Qual Program