Recent Board Activity

Date Titlesort icon Author Type Download
5/3/2000 DOE Responding to Board Letter Dated March 2, 2000, Regarding the Quality of Authorization Bases at the Defense Nuclear Facilities T. J. Glauthier Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/7/2002 DOE Responding to Board Letter Dated March 29, 2002, Regarding Independent Assessment of the Savannah River Performance Based Incentives for the High Level Waste Program Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/14/2002 DOE Responding to Board Letter Dated November 21, 2001, Regarding Revisions in the 2000-1 Implementation Plan David G. Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/23/2002 DOE Responding to Board Letter Dated November 26, 2001, Regarding Concerns in the Maintenance Program at the Y-12 National Security Complex David E. Beck Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/23/2002 DOE Responding to Board Letter Dated November 5, 2001, Regarding Design Requirements Related to Emergency Operations Centers Francis S. Blake Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/2/2002 DOE Responding to Board Letter Dated October 2, 2001, Regarding the Integrated Safety Management System of the CH2M Hill Hanford Group Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
11/26/2002 DOE Responding to Board Letter Dated October 3, 2002, Regarding Observations on Enriched Uranium Operations Wet Chemistry Resumption Activities at the Y-12 National Security Complex Everet H. Beckner Letter application/pdf iconPDF
11/3/2000 DOE Responding to Board Letter Dated September 20, 2000, Regarding the Closure to Support Safe and Reliable Operation of the Hanford Spent Nuclear Fuel Project Facilities Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/1/2002 DOE Responding to Board Letter Dated September 9, 2002, Regarding Waste Feed Delivery Transfer System at the Hanford Site Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/3/2002 DOE Responding to Board Letter Regarding Justification for Continued Operations in relation to W88 Hazard Analysis Report Brigadier General Rona Haeckel, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
11/1/2002 DOE Responding to Board Letter Regarding the Use of Thermogravimetric Analysis to Stabilize Plutonium Oxide Jesse Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/3/2002 DOE Responding to Board Reporting Requirement Dated August 1, 2002, Regarding the Single Point of Contact Concept Relative to W80 Enchanced Transportation Cart Approval Everet H. Beckner Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/23/2002 DOE Responding to Board Reporting Requirement Dated February 22, 2002, Regarding Implementation of DOE Order 420.1, Facility Safety, at the Defense Nuclear Facilities Everet H. Beckner Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/17/2002 DOE Responding to Board Reporting Requirement Dated March 7, 2002, Regarding the Design of the Sandia Underground Reactor Facility Everet H. Beckner Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/17/2002 DOE Responding to Board Reporting Requirement Dated May 13, 2002, Regarding Concerns Related to the Fire Protection at Building 9212 at Y-12 National Security Complex John Gordon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/24/2002 DOE Responding to Board Reporting Requirement Dated May 20, 2002 Regarding Storage and Disposition of Inactive Actinide Nuclear Material Everet H. Beckner Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/1/2002 DOE Responding to Board Reporting Requirement on High-Level Waste Activities at the Savannah River Site and Alternative Technologies for the Removal of Cesium from Salt Waste Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/18/2000 DOE Responding to the Board's Letter Dated February 29, 2000, Regarding the Inaccurate and Incomplete Information Provided to the Board on Hanford Splent Nuclear Fuel Project Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/2/2000 DOE Responding to the Issues Raised in the Board's Technical Report 25, Quality Assurance for Safety-Related Software at the Department of Energy Defense Nuclear Facilities T. J. Glauthier Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/2/2001 DOE Responds to Board Letter Dated August 14, 2001 Regarding the Incorporation of the Disposition Requirements of DOE Order 430.1A in Contracts at Hanford Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/30/2001 DOE Responds to Board Letter Dated December 1, 1999 Regarding Quality Assurance at National Nuclear Security Administration Sites Ralph E. Erickson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/18/2003 DOE Responds to Board Letter Dated February 14, 2003 Regarding Suspect/Counterfeit Items in Safety-Related Applications and Items Heat-Treated by Temperform USA Beverly A. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/21/2003 DOE Responds to Board Letter Dated February 14, 2003 Regarding Suspect/Counterfeit Items in Safety-Related or Mission-Sensitive Applications Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/14/2005 DOE Responds to Board Letter Dated February 14, 2005 Regarding 2004-1 Implementation Plan Samuel W. Bodman Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/3/2003 DOE Responds to Board Letter Dated February 28, 2003 Regarding Proposed Changes to Existing DOE Safety Orders and Other Standards Robert G. Card Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/14/2003 DOE Responds to Board Letter Dated January 24, 2003 Regarding Board Review of National Nuclear Security Administration Policy Letters Linton F. Brooks Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/21/2003 DOE Responds to Board Letter Dated March 7, 2003 Regarding Readiness Preparations and Readiness Review Process at Hanford Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/31/2001 DOE Responds to Board Letter Dated May 29, 2001 Regarding the Use of the F-Canyon for Plutonium Disposition Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/16/1997 DOE Responds to Board Questions on Contractor Safety Requirements at DOE Field Sites as a Part of the Integrated Safety Management Process, Recommendation 95-2 Elizabeth A. Moler Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/28/2011 DOE Responds to Board Recommendation 2010-1 Steven Chu Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/15/2003 DOE Responds to Board Reporing Requirement Dated July 31, 2003 Regarding Glovebox Fire at Building 371 at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/15/2003 DOE Responds to Board Reportin gRequirement Dated November 13, 2002 on Continuous Air Monitor (CAM) and Radiation Alarm Monitor (RAM) Systems at the Pantex Plant Everet H. Beckner Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/28/2003 DOE Responds to Board Reporting Requirement Dated February 6, 2003 Regarding Multi-Canister Overpacks at the Hanford Spent Nuclear Fuel Project Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/21/2003 DOE Responds to Board Reporting Requirement Dated March 7, 2003 Regarding Flood Mitigation at Technical Area 18 after the Cerro Grande Fire Linton F. Brooks Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/17/2003 DOE Responds to Board Reporting Requirement Regarding Deficiencies in Safety and Design Basis of the Hanford Waste Treatment Plan Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/3/2003 DOE Responds to Board Reporting Requirement Regarding Safety-Related Action Plans Defunded by the DOE at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Linton Brooks Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/10/2011 DOE Responds to the Board Letter of August 5, 2010, Regarding Safety Issues at the Criticality Experiments Facility (CEF) at Nevada National Security Site Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/25/2011 Doe Responds to the Board Letter of January 25, 2011 on the 'Expedited' Directives Review Daniel B. Poneman Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/28/2011 DOE Responds to the February 8, 2011 Board Letter Concerning Potential Revisions to the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement (CMRR) Project Nuclear Facility Safety Strategy and Design Thomas P. D'Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/11/2003 DOE Responds to the January 2003 Reporting Requirement Regarding Implementation of DOE Protocols for Testing High-Efficiency Particulate (HEPA) Filters at Defense Nuclear Facilities Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/30/2000 DOE Response Board Letters Dated March 30, 2000, and May 30, 2000, Regarding the Design and Construction of the Hydrogen Fluoride Supply System Project at the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge Madelyn R. Creedon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/19/2011 DOE Response Printed in Federal Register Volume 76 Number 138 Recommendation Federal Register Notice application/pdf iconPDF
6/28/2011 DOE Response Printed in the Federal Register Volume 76 Number 124 Recommendation Federal Register Notice application/pdf iconPDF
8/24/2001 DOE Response to a Board Letter Dated July 30, 2001 Relative to the Selection of a Preferred Alternative for Processing the High-Level waste Salt Solutions and Salt Cake at the Savannah River Site Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/17/1998 DOE Response to a Board Letter Dated November 17, 1998, Regarding Restart of Certain Activities at LANL Victor H. Reis Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/9/2001 DOE Response to a Board Staff Issue Report Regarding Electrical, Instrumentation and Control, and Fire Protection Systems at the Los Alamos National Laboratory David H. Crandall Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/14/1998 DOE Response to a May 14, 1998, Letter Requesting Information to Assist in Preparing a Report to Congress on Evaluations and Assessment of Proposals to Externally Regulate Its Defense Nuclear Facilities Elizabeth A. Moler Letter application/pdf iconPDF
11/21/2013 DOE Response to August 26, 2013, Board Letter also enclosing "Open Issues with the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) Safety Basis" Edward Bruce Held Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/14/2004 DOE Response to Board April 12, 2004, Letter Regarding the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's Proposed Safety Basis for Building 332, the Plutonium Facility Linton F. Brooks Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/16/2012 DOE Response to Board April 18, 2012, Letter Concerning Quality Assurance at the Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR) at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF