Recent Board Activity

Date Titlesort icon Author Type Download
12/15/1997 DOE Response to Board June 5, 1997, Letter Regarding Recommendation 95-1 Ray A. Hunter Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/5/2011 DOE Response to Board June 7, 2011, Letter Expressing Concerns on the Use of the Low Order Accumulation Model (LOAM) by the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) Project at Hanford David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/1/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated April 23, 2002, Regarding Aqueous Recovery Line for Plutonium-238 Scrap at Los Alamos National Laborator Everet H. Beckner Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/1/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated April 29, 1999, Regarding Appropriate Radiation Protection Measures for Detecting, Controlling and Monitoring Metal Tritides Ernest J. Moniz Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/21/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated April 30, 2001 on the Quality and Adequacy of the Authorization Bases for the Defense Nuclear Facilities at the Y-12 National Security Complex Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/19/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated August 26, 1999, Requesting a Report Regarding the Adequacy of Implementation of DOE Order 425.1A, "Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities" T. J. Glauther Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/30/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated August 29, 2000 Regarding Hanford River Protection Program High-Level Waste Tank Integrity Project Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
11/30/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated August 29, 2000, on Hanford High-Level Waste Storage Tank Integrity Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/29/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated December 1, 1999, in Regarding issues on Hazard Identification and Analysis at the Hanford 233-S Plutonium Concentration Facility Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/25/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated December 21, 1999 and Enclosing the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Corrective Action Plan and Current Status of the Corrective Actions Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/25/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated December 6, 1999, on Tech 24, Safe Handling of Insensitive High Explosive Weapon Subassemblies at the Pantex Plant Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/18/2011 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated February 15, 2002, Regarding the Planned Multi-Canister Overpacks Welding at the Hanford Spent Nuclear Fuel Project Jesse Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/11/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated February 27, 2001 on the Implementation of Seamless Safety for the 21st Century (SS-21) for the W76 and W88 Nuclear Explosive Operations at the Pantex Plant Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/9/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated January 20, 2000, and the Assignment of Mr. John M. Gilligan, DOE's Chief Information Officer, as Lead to Develop a Report on Software Quality Assurance T. J. Glauthier Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/9/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated January 22, 2001 on the Design and Construction Projects for Defense Nuclear Facilities at Los Alamos National Laboratory R. E. Glass Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/26/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated January 28, 1999, Regarding the Conditional Acceptance of the 94-1 Implementation Plan David G. Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/25/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated January 28, 2002, Regarding Status of the Revision to the Nuclear Air Cleaning Handbook, ERDA 76-21 Ralph E. Erickson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/20/2006 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated June 28, 2006, Regarding the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program Clay Sell Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/22/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated June 30, 2000, Regarding the Federal Technical Capability Panel T. J. Glauthier Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/27/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated June 5, 2002 Regarding Maintenance and Reliable Operations at the K Basis at the Hanford Site Jesse Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/29/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated June 7, 2000, Regarding Pit Disassembly and Conversion Facility Rose Gottemoeller Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/15/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 15, 2001 Regarding Concerns Relative to the Maintenance Program at the Y-12 National Security Complex Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/7/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 23, 2001 and Enclosing a Comprehensive Set of Corrective Actions Developed by the Rocky Flats Field Office Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/12/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 23, 2001 Regarding Implementation Plan 2000-1 Revision 1 Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/3/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 29, 2000, on Fire Protection Program at the Pantex Plant Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/28/2011 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 30, 2011, Concerning Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, Improvements in Conduct of Operations David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/29/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 4, 2002, Regarding the High Level Waste Salt Processing Capability at the Savannah River Site Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/20/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 5, 2001 Regarding Concerns on Enhanced Transportation Cart (ETC) Relative to Recommendation 98-2 Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/9/2009 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 5, 2009, Regarding the Savannah River Tank 48 Treatment Project Jeffrey M. Allison Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/8/2006 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 1, 2006, Regarding Draft DOE M441.1-1, Nuclear Material Packaging Manual C. Russell H. Shearer Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/13/1996 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 10, 1996, Regarding the Board's Review on the DOE's Operational Readiness Review of the High-level Liquid Waste Evaporator at the Idaho Chemical Processing Plant Thomas P. Grumbly Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/17/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 23, 2000, Regarding Savannah River Site's Plans to Return Tank 49 to a High-Level Waste Storage Mission Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/14/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 24, 2000, Regarding the Recovery of Los Alamos National Laboratory from the Cerro Grande Fire Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/30/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 24, 2001 and Providing that the DOE will Submit a Revised Implementation Plan for Recommendation 2001-1 by September 15, 2001 Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/30/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 24, 2001 and Providing that the DOE will Submit a Revised Implementation Plan for Recommendation 2001-1 by September 15, 2001 Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/20/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 29, 2001 Regarding Concerns Relative to Feasibility of Transferring the Americium and Curium(AM/CM) Solution in F-Canyon at the SRS to High-Level Waste (HLW) for Vitrification in the Defense Waste Processing Facility Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/29/1994 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 6, 1994, on the DOE's Reorganization Hazel R. O'Leary Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/19/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated November 1, 2000, Regarding the Approval by Field Managers of Nuclear Safety Analysis Methodologies David Michaels Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/9/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated November 2, 1999, on the Review of Ventilation Systems in Building 3019 Used for Safe Operations and Long Term Storage for Uranium-233 at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/22/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated November 2, 1999, Regarding Increasing oncerns on Building 9206 at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/15/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated November 22, 1999, Relative to the Safety Analyses for the Replacement High-Level Waste Evaporator at the Savannah River Site Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/30/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated November 9, 1999, Regarding the Safety Management Deficiencies and Project Management at the Y-12 Plant Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/4/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated October 15, 2001, Regarding Integrated Safety Management issues for Oak Ridge Operations Office and Bechtel Robert G. Card Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/4/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated October 15, 2001, Regarding Integrated Safety Management issues for Oak Ridge Operations Office and Bechtel Rober G. Card Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/16/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated October 5, 1999, Regarding Integrated Safety Management Progress at the Nevada Test Site Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/15/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated September 23, 2002, Regarding Fire Protection at the Pantex Plant David E. Beck Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/2/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter in Relation to a More Effective Utilization of the Contractual Arrangements with the Center for Chemical Process Safety and the Institute for Nuclear Power Operations T. J. Glauthier Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/16/2011 DOE Response to Board Letter of April 20, 2011, Concerning the Safety Posture of the Y-12 National Security Complex Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/18/2006 DOE Response to Board Letter of April 24, 2006, Regarding the Methodology for Determining Repackaging Needs and Prioritization of Repacking Nuclear Materials C. Russell H. Shearer Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/7/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter of April 29, 1999, Concerning the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program Failure Data Experience Award Bill Richardson Letter application/pdf iconPDF