Recent Board Activity

Date Titlesort icon Author Type Download
6/16/2011 DOE Response to Board Letter of April 20, 2011, Concerning the Safety Posture of the Y-12 National Security Complex Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/18/2006 DOE Response to Board Letter of April 24, 2006, Regarding the Methodology for Determining Repackaging Needs and Prioritization of Repacking Nuclear Materials C. Russell H. Shearer Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/7/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter of April 29, 1999, Concerning the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program Failure Data Experience Award Bill Richardson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/19/2006 DOE Response to Board Letter of August 16, 2006, re: Operability of Device Assembly Facility Thomas P. D'Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/5/2009 DOE Response to Board Letter of December 16, 2008, Documenting Concerns on Disposition of Findings Resulting from Nuclear Explosive Safety Studies and NES Change Evaluations Thomas P. D' Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/25/2012 DOE Response to Board Letter of December 29, 2011, which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning Activity-Level Work Planning and Control at the Y-12 National Security Complex Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/26/2012 DOE Response to Board Letter of February 28, 2012, which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning the NNSA’s Plans to Review the Accident Analyses, Modify the DSA, and Evaluate the Reliability of Controls for the Annular Core Research Reactor at SNL Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/29/2008 DOE Response to Board Letter of February 6, 2008, Concerning the Need for a Safety-Significant Water Supply for the Highly Enriched Uranium Material Facility Gerald L. Talbot, Jr. Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/15/2008 DOE Response to Board Letter of February 6, 2008, Regarding the Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility Fire Suppression System Robert L. Smolen Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/23/2012 DOE Response to Board Letter of March 2, 2012, Informing the Board that the Requested Update to the Recommendation 2011-1 Implementation Plan (IP) by April 30, 2012, is not Achievable Until Plan Development and Approval Concludes in April 2012 David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/2/2006 DOE Response to Board Letter of March 27, 2006, Regarding Review of the Criticality Experiments Facility (CEF) Project Design Thomas P. D'Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/19/1996 DOE Response to Board Letter of November 15, 1995, re: Board Views Regarding Stabilization of the Mark 16 and 22 Fuels and the Future of the F-Canyon and H-Canyon Chemical Processing Facilities at SRS Hazel R. O'Leary Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/2/1997 DOE Response to Board Letter of September 17, 1997, on the Safe Restoration of the Plutonium Finishing Plant at the Hanford Site Alvin L. AIm Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/9/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter on Thermal Stabilization Activities in Building 707 at the Rocky Flatz Environmental Technology Site Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/8/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Regarding Follow-Up Questions from the February 2001 Public Meetings on Integrated Safety Management and Providing the DOE Line Management Chains for the National Nuclear Security Agency and Environmental Management Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/4/2014 DOE Response to Board March 12, 2014, Letter Advising DOE to Thoroughly Evaluate the Ventilation System, Safety Controls and Contingency Plans at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) to Ensure Adequate Protection of the Workers and the Public David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/30/2012 DOE Response to Board March 2, 2012, Letter Regarding the Effectiveness of the Nuclear Explosive Safety (NES) Program at Pantex Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/30/2012 DOE Response to Board March 27, 2012, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning the Review of A- and K-Area Fire Water Supplies, Savannah River Site David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/30/2014 DOE response to Board March 31, 2014 letter closing Recommendation 2005-1 and requesting information regarding DOE updated plan and schedule for implementing DOE Manual 441.1-1 and plans for revising DOE Manual 441.1. Ernest J. Moniz Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/20/2014 DOE Response to Board May 23, 2014, Letter Requesting Evaluation of the Need for an Additional Independent Assessment at the Completion of Startup Testing of the Idaho National Laboratory's Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/19/1996 DOE Response to Board November 15, 1995, Letter on Mark 16 and 22 Fuel at Savannah River Canyons Hazel R. O'Leary Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/16/2013 DOE Response to Board November 19, 2012, Letter Concerning the Upgrade to the Nuclear Facility Safety Basis for Area G at Los Alamos National Laboratory James J. McConnell Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/3/2012 DOE Response to Board November 7, 2011, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning Nuclear Explosive Safety (NES) Issues at the Pantex Plant, Requesting an Additional 30 Days to Answer Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/6/2012 DOE Response to Board November 7, 2011, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning the Review of the Tracking and Closure Process for Nuclear Explosive Safety (NES) Findings at the Pantex Plant Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/23/1996 DOE Response to Board Observations Concerning the NESS Revalidation Process Thomas P. Seitz Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/6/2007 DOE Response to Board Observations on the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Mobile Characterization Unit Generic Documented Safety Analysis Paul M. Golan Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/11/2008 DOE Response to Board October 16, 2007, Letter that Provided a 60 Day Reporting Requirement Addressing Concerns about the Safety of Nuclear Operations at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Thomas P. D'Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/5/2014 DOE Response to Board October 23, 2013, Letter Detailing the Program Secretarial Officer's Assessment of the Metrics Used in Performing Line Oversight of Criticality Safety Programs Matthew Moury Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/9/2011 DOE Response to Board October 6, 2011, Reporting Requirement, enclosing the CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF) Corrective Action Plan (CAP) David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/16/1997 DOE Response to Board Report of September 5, 1997, on the W79 Single Internal Readiness Review at Pantex Site Gene Ives Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/9/2003 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Dated July 9, 2003 Regarding Recommendations by the Senior Technical Advisory Panel David E. Beck Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/27/2002 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Dated March 21, 2002 Regarding DOE's Future Plans for the Utilization of Processing Capabilities at the Savannah River Site relative to 2000-1 Implementation Plan Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/21/2004 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Dated March 24, 2004, Regarding Hydrogen Hazards Related to Non-Newtonian High-Level Waste and Black Cell Design Concept for the Office of River Protection's Waste Treatment Plant at Hanford Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/30/2002 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Dated November 13, 2002, Regarding Criticality Safety Practices at Y-12 Everet H. Beckner Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/30/2013 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Issued February 25, 2013, Regarding the Fire Protection Program at Pantex Neile L. Miller Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/27/2013 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Issued January 3, 2013, Regarding Safety Issues at the Plutonium Facility (PF-4) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Steven Chu Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/27/2012 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement of April 13, 2012, Regarding the Operability and Safety of the Electrical Distribution System at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant, Hanford Site David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/9/2012 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement of June 11, 2012, Regarding the Transuranic Waste Facility (TWF) Project Preliminary Design at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/27/2012 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement of June 27, 2012, Concerning Safety Issues with the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Maintenance Program David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/19/2004 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Regarding a Weapon Dismantlement at the Pantex Plant Linton F. Brooks Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/17/1996 DOE Response to Board Request to Revise 93-4 Implementation Plan Thomas P. Grumbly Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/17/1996 DOE Response to Board Request to Revise 93-4 Implementation Plan Thomas P. Grumbly Letter application/pdf iconPDF
11/16/2011 DOE Response to Board September 13, 2011, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning Ammonia Hazards at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
11/5/2012 DOE Response to Board September 6, 2012, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning NNSA's Approach to Validate the Modeling Assumptions at the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) Main Building, Y-12 National Security Complex Thomas P. D'Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/7/1998 DOE Response to Board Staff Issues Concerning Phase II Restart at Savannah River Ernest J. Moniz Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/23/1996 DOE Response to Board Staff Report Entitled "Safety of HEPA Filter Units in Hanford B-Plant Exhaust Ventilation System" Thomas P. Grumbly Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/23/1996 DOE Response to Board Staff Review of LLNL re: Integrated Safety Management Victor Stello, Jr. Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/30/2001 DOE Response to Board Tech-29, Criticality Safety at DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/7/1997 DOE Response to Board Trip Report of August 15, 1996, Regarding Storing and Handling of Spent Nuclear Fuel at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Alvin L. Alm Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/24/1996 DOE Response to Board Trip Report of December 15, 1995, Review of the Design Criteria for the Spent Nuclear Fuel Project's Canister Storage Building at Hanford Alvin L. Alm Letter application/pdf iconPDF