Recent Board Activity

Date Titlesort icon Author Type Download
7/6/1995 DOE Response to Board Concerns Related to DOE Order 4700.1 Charles B. Curtis Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/2/2012 DOE Response to Board December 13, 2011, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning the Design, Functionality, and Maintenance of Safety Systems at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Requesting an Additional 30 Days to Answer Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/8/2012 DOE Response to Board December 13, 2011, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Describing Specific Actions the NNSA has taken or Plans to take to Ensure that Safety Systems at the Plutonium Facility at LLNL can Perform their Safety Functions Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/24/2009 DOE Response to Board February 10, 2009, Letter Regarding Open Issues at the Salt Waste Processing Facility Jeffrey M. Allison Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/3/2011 DOE Response to Board February 4, 2011, Letter Regarding Storage of Non-MAA Material at the Y-12 National Security Complex Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/29/1995 DOE Response to Board Inquirers Concerning Funding of Radiation Protection Programs Included in the 91-6 Implementation Plan Hazel R. O'Leary Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/19/1995 DOE Response to Board Inquires Regarding Funding of Radiological Protection Programs as a Part of the 91-6 Implementation Plan Hazel R. O'Leary Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/5/2012 DOE Response to Board January 20, 2012, Letter Regarding Wear Allowances in the Design of Piping, Process Vessels, and Pulse Jet Mixers (PJM) at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/11/2013 DOE Response to Board July 15, 2013, Letter Revising its Technical Approach to Resolve the Board's Safety Concerns Associated with Control and Operation of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization (WTP) Pulse Jet Mixed (PJM) Vessels Containing Solids Daniel B. Poneman Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/28/2012 DOE Response to Board July 18, 2012, Letter Regarding Seismic Analysis of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Plutonium Facility (PF-4) Daniel B. Poneman Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/13/2012 DOE Response to Board June 18, 2012, Letter Concerning the Plutonium Facility at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/6/2012 DOE Response to Board June 18, 2012, Letter Requesting an Additional 60 Days beyond the 45 Day Initial Extension for further Development of Responses to the Board Reporting Requirement Concerning the Plutonium Facility, Los Alamos National Laboratory James J. McConnell Letter application/pdf iconPDF
11/5/2012 DOE Response to Board June 18, 2012, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning Safety Basis and Quality Assurance at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Thomas P. D'Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/21/2011 DOE Response to Board June 24, 2011, Reporting Requirement Outlining Actions Taken or Planned Regarding the Fire Protection Program at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/15/1997 DOE Response to Board June 5, 1997, Letter Regarding Recommendation 95-1 Ray A. Hunter Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/5/2011 DOE Response to Board June 7, 2011, Letter Expressing Concerns on the Use of the Low Order Accumulation Model (LOAM) by the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) Project at Hanford David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/1/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated April 23, 2002, Regarding Aqueous Recovery Line for Plutonium-238 Scrap at Los Alamos National Laborator Everet H. Beckner Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/1/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated April 29, 1999, Regarding Appropriate Radiation Protection Measures for Detecting, Controlling and Monitoring Metal Tritides Ernest J. Moniz Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/21/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated April 30, 2001 on the Quality and Adequacy of the Authorization Bases for the Defense Nuclear Facilities at the Y-12 National Security Complex Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/19/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated August 26, 1999, Requesting a Report Regarding the Adequacy of Implementation of DOE Order 425.1A, "Startup and Restart of Nuclear Facilities" T. J. Glauther Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/30/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated August 29, 2000 Regarding Hanford River Protection Program High-Level Waste Tank Integrity Project Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
11/30/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated August 29, 2000, on Hanford High-Level Waste Storage Tank Integrity Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/29/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated December 1, 1999, in Regarding issues on Hazard Identification and Analysis at the Hanford 233-S Plutonium Concentration Facility Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/25/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated December 21, 1999 and Enclosing the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Corrective Action Plan and Current Status of the Corrective Actions Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/25/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated December 6, 1999, on Tech 24, Safe Handling of Insensitive High Explosive Weapon Subassemblies at the Pantex Plant Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/18/2011 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated February 15, 2002, Regarding the Planned Multi-Canister Overpacks Welding at the Hanford Spent Nuclear Fuel Project Jesse Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/11/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated February 27, 2001 on the Implementation of Seamless Safety for the 21st Century (SS-21) for the W76 and W88 Nuclear Explosive Operations at the Pantex Plant Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/9/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated January 20, 2000, and the Assignment of Mr. John M. Gilligan, DOE's Chief Information Officer, as Lead to Develop a Report on Software Quality Assurance T. J. Glauthier Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/9/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated January 22, 2001 on the Design and Construction Projects for Defense Nuclear Facilities at Los Alamos National Laboratory R. E. Glass Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/26/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated January 28, 1999, Regarding the Conditional Acceptance of the 94-1 Implementation Plan David G. Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/25/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated January 28, 2002, Regarding Status of the Revision to the Nuclear Air Cleaning Handbook, ERDA 76-21 Ralph E. Erickson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/20/2006 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated June 28, 2006, Regarding the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program Clay Sell Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/22/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated June 30, 2000, Regarding the Federal Technical Capability Panel T. J. Glauthier Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/27/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated June 5, 2002 Regarding Maintenance and Reliable Operations at the K Basis at the Hanford Site Jesse Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/29/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated June 7, 2000, Regarding Pit Disassembly and Conversion Facility Rose Gottemoeller Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/15/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 15, 2001 Regarding Concerns Relative to the Maintenance Program at the Y-12 National Security Complex Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/7/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 23, 2001 and Enclosing a Comprehensive Set of Corrective Actions Developed by the Rocky Flats Field Office Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/12/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 23, 2001 Regarding Implementation Plan 2000-1 Revision 1 Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/3/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 29, 2000, on Fire Protection Program at the Pantex Plant Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/28/2011 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 30, 2011, Concerning Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC, Improvements in Conduct of Operations David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/29/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 4, 2002, Regarding the High Level Waste Salt Processing Capability at the Savannah River Site Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/20/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 5, 2001 Regarding Concerns on Enhanced Transportation Cart (ETC) Relative to Recommendation 98-2 Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/9/2009 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 5, 2009, Regarding the Savannah River Tank 48 Treatment Project Jeffrey M. Allison Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/8/2006 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 1, 2006, Regarding Draft DOE M441.1-1, Nuclear Material Packaging Manual C. Russell H. Shearer Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/13/1996 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 10, 1996, Regarding the Board's Review on the DOE's Operational Readiness Review of the High-level Liquid Waste Evaporator at the Idaho Chemical Processing Plant Thomas P. Grumbly Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/17/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 23, 2000, Regarding Savannah River Site's Plans to Return Tank 49 to a High-Level Waste Storage Mission Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/14/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 24, 2000, Regarding the Recovery of Los Alamos National Laboratory from the Cerro Grande Fire Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/30/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 24, 2001 and Providing that the DOE will Submit a Revised Implementation Plan for Recommendation 2001-1 by September 15, 2001 Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/30/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 24, 2001 and Providing that the DOE will Submit a Revised Implementation Plan for Recommendation 2001-1 by September 15, 2001 Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/20/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 29, 2001 Regarding Concerns Relative to Feasibility of Transferring the Americium and Curium(AM/CM) Solution in F-Canyon at the SRS to High-Level Waste (HLW) for Vitrification in the Defense Waste Processing Facility Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF