Recent Board Activity

Date Titlesort icon Author Type Download
5/30/2012 DOE Response to Board March 27, 2012, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning the Review of A- and K-Area Fire Water Supplies, Savannah River Site David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/19/1996 DOE Response to Board November 15, 1995, Letter on Mark 16 and 22 Fuel at Savannah River Canyons Hazel R. O'Leary Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/16/2013 DOE Response to Board November 19, 2012, Letter Concerning the Upgrade to the Nuclear Facility Safety Basis for Area G at Los Alamos National Laboratory James J. McConnell Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/3/2012 DOE Response to Board November 7, 2011, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning Nuclear Explosive Safety (NES) Issues at the Pantex Plant, Requesting an Additional 30 Days to Answer Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/6/2012 DOE Response to Board November 7, 2011, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning the Review of the Tracking and Closure Process for Nuclear Explosive Safety (NES) Findings at the Pantex Plant Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/23/1996 DOE Response to Board Observations Concerning the NESS Revalidation Process Thomas P. Seitz Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/6/2007 DOE Response to Board Observations on the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Mobile Characterization Unit Generic Documented Safety Analysis Paul M. Golan Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/11/2008 DOE Response to Board October 16, 2007, Letter that Provided a 60 Day Reporting Requirement Addressing Concerns about the Safety of Nuclear Operations at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Thomas P. D'Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/5/2014 DOE Response to Board October 23, 2013, Letter Detailing the Program Secretarial Officer's Assessment of the Metrics Used in Performing Line Oversight of Criticality Safety Programs Matthew Moury Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/9/2011 DOE Response to Board October 6, 2011, Reporting Requirement, enclosing the CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF) Corrective Action Plan (CAP) David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/16/1997 DOE Response to Board Report of September 5, 1997, on the W79 Single Internal Readiness Review at Pantex Site Gene Ives Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/9/2003 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Dated July 9, 2003 Regarding Recommendations by the Senior Technical Advisory Panel David E. Beck Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/27/2002 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Dated March 21, 2002 Regarding DOE's Future Plans for the Utilization of Processing Capabilities at the Savannah River Site relative to 2000-1 Implementation Plan Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/21/2004 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Dated March 24, 2004, Regarding Hydrogen Hazards Related to Non-Newtonian High-Level Waste and Black Cell Design Concept for the Office of River Protection's Waste Treatment Plant at Hanford Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/30/2002 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Dated November 13, 2002, Regarding Criticality Safety Practices at Y-12 Everet H. Beckner Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/30/2013 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Issued February 25, 2013, Regarding the Fire Protection Program at Pantex Neile L. Miller Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/27/2013 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Issued January 3, 2013, Regarding Safety Issues at the Plutonium Facility (PF-4) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Steven Chu Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/27/2012 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement of April 13, 2012, Regarding the Operability and Safety of the Electrical Distribution System at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant, Hanford Site David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/9/2012 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement of June 11, 2012, Regarding the Transuranic Waste Facility (TWF) Project Preliminary Design at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/27/2012 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement of June 27, 2012, Concerning Safety Issues with the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Maintenance Program David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/19/2004 DOE Response to Board Reporting Requirement Regarding a Weapon Dismantlement at the Pantex Plant Linton F. Brooks Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/17/1996 DOE Response to Board Request to Revise 93-4 Implementation Plan Thomas P. Grumbly Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/17/1996 DOE Response to Board Request to Revise 93-4 Implementation Plan Thomas P. Grumbly Letter application/pdf iconPDF
11/16/2011 DOE Response to Board September 13, 2011, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning Ammonia Hazards at the Hanford Site Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
11/5/2012 DOE Response to Board September 6, 2012, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning NNSA's Approach to Validate the Modeling Assumptions at the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) Main Building, Y-12 National Security Complex Thomas P. D'Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/7/1998 DOE Response to Board Staff Issues Concerning Phase II Restart at Savannah River Ernest J. Moniz Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/23/1996 DOE Response to Board Staff Report Entitled "Safety of HEPA Filter Units in Hanford B-Plant Exhaust Ventilation System" Thomas P. Grumbly Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/23/1996 DOE Response to Board Staff Review of LLNL re: Integrated Safety Management Victor Stello, Jr. Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/30/2001 DOE Response to Board Tech-29, Criticality Safety at DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/7/1997 DOE Response to Board Trip Report of August 15, 1996, Regarding Storing and Handling of Spent Nuclear Fuel at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Alvin L. Alm Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/24/1996 DOE Response to Board Trip Report of December 15, 1995, Review of the Design Criteria for the Spent Nuclear Fuel Project's Canister Storage Building at Hanford Alvin L. Alm Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/8/1996 DOE Response to Board Trip Report of December 18, 1995, Regarding Board Concerns with the Proximity of the Central Training Facility at the Defense Waste Processing Facility Richard J. Guimond Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/26/1996 DOE Response to Board Trip Report of July 5, 1996, Which Discusses the Board's review of the Phase II Operational Readiness Review Alvin A. Alm Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/30/2011 DOE Response to Board's August 3, 2011, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement, Citing a 45-Day Delay Until November 14, 2011, for the Requested Report on Pretreatment Facility Process Vessels at WTP, Hanford Site David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/27/1997 DOE Response to Board's Comments of November 11, 1996, on the Systems Requirement Document, the Systems Engineering Management Plan, and the Cylinder Program Management Plan for the 95-1 Implementation Plan Thomas P. Grumbly Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/5/1997 DOE Response to Board's Concerns over the In-Process HEU Materials Stored at the Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge Victor H. Reis Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/28/1994 DOE Response to Board's January 27, 1994, Trip Report Thomas P. Grumbly Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/15/1996 DOE Response to Board's June 11, 1996, Trip Report Reviewing the Hanford Canister Storage Building Alvin L. Alm Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/20/1998 DOE Response to Board's Letter Dated February 25, 1998, Concerning Electrical, Control and Fire Protection at Hanford James M. Owendoff Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/25/2008 DOE Response to Board's October 26, 2007 Letter, Concerning the Safety Rationale for Continuing the Operation of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Thomas P. D'Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/28/1996 DOE Response to Board's Partial Acceptance of the DOE's 94-2 Implementation Plan Hazel R. O'Leary Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/30/1996 DOE Response to Board's Report "Safety of HEPA Filter Units in Hanford" Alvin A. Alm Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/21/1994 DOE Response to Board's Request for a Report on the DOE's Nuclear Health and Safety Management Program and a Report on the Nuclear Safety Responsibilities and Organizational Arrangements Hazel R. O'Leary Letter application/pdf iconPDF
11/12/1999 DOE Response to Board's Request for Information on Radiation Protection Programs for Work with Special Tritium Compounds at Mound Ernest J. Moniz Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/21/1996 DOE Response to Board's Review of NESS Performed by the Nevada Operations Office Thomas P. Seitz Letter application/pdf iconPDF
11/5/1996 DOE Response to Board's Visit to HB-Line at Savannah River Site Alvin L. Alm Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/22/2011 DOE Response to February 28, 2011, Board Letter to the Secretary, Expressing Concerns about the Lack of Viable Disposition Paths for Fissile Materials and other DOE Excess Nuclear Materials Inés R. Triay Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/27/2009 DOE Response to February 6, 2009 Board Letter Regarding Electrical Safety Issues in H-Area of Savannah River Site Jeffrey M. Allison Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/25/2008 DOE Response to First Series Detailed Review of Corrective Actions for the Spill of Waste from Single Shell Tank S-102 at the Hanford Site David A. Brockman Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/8/1990 DOE Response to Issuance of Board Report on the Status of the DOE's Nuclear Safety Orders Related to Recommendation 90-2 James D. Watkins Letter application/pdf iconPDF