Recent Board Activity

Date Titlesort icon Author Type Download
4/29/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 4, 2002, Regarding the High Level Waste Salt Processing Capability at the Savannah River Site Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/20/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 5, 2001 Regarding Concerns on Enhanced Transportation Cart (ETC) Relative to Recommendation 98-2 Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/9/2009 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated March 5, 2009, Regarding the Savannah River Tank 48 Treatment Project Jeffrey M. Allison Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/8/2006 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 1, 2006, Regarding Draft DOE M441.1-1, Nuclear Material Packaging Manual C. Russell H. Shearer Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/13/1996 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 10, 1996, Regarding the Board's Review on the DOE's Operational Readiness Review of the High-level Liquid Waste Evaporator at the Idaho Chemical Processing Plant Thomas P. Grumbly Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/17/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 23, 2000, Regarding Savannah River Site's Plans to Return Tank 49 to a High-Level Waste Storage Mission Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/14/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 24, 2000, Regarding the Recovery of Los Alamos National Laboratory from the Cerro Grande Fire Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/30/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 24, 2001 and Providing that the DOE will Submit a Revised Implementation Plan for Recommendation 2001-1 by September 15, 2001 Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/30/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 24, 2001 and Providing that the DOE will Submit a Revised Implementation Plan for Recommendation 2001-1 by September 15, 2001 Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/20/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 29, 2001 Regarding Concerns Relative to Feasibility of Transferring the Americium and Curium(AM/CM) Solution in F-Canyon at the SRS to High-Level Waste (HLW) for Vitrification in the Defense Waste Processing Facility Jessie Hill Roberson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/29/1994 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated May 6, 1994, on the DOE's Reorganization Hazel R. O'Leary Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/19/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated November 1, 2000, Regarding the Approval by Field Managers of Nuclear Safety Analysis Methodologies David Michaels Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/9/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated November 2, 1999, on the Review of Ventilation Systems in Building 3019 Used for Safe Operations and Long Term Storage for Uranium-233 at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/22/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated November 2, 1999, Regarding Increasing oncerns on Building 9206 at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/15/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated November 22, 1999, Relative to the Safety Analyses for the Replacement High-Level Waste Evaporator at the Savannah River Site Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/30/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated November 9, 1999, Regarding the Safety Management Deficiencies and Project Management at the Y-12 Plant Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/4/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated October 15, 2001, Regarding Integrated Safety Management issues for Oak Ridge Operations Office and Bechtel Robert G. Card Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/4/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated October 15, 2001, Regarding Integrated Safety Management issues for Oak Ridge Operations Office and Bechtel Rober G. Card Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/16/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated October 5, 1999, Regarding Integrated Safety Management Progress at the Nevada Test Site Brigadier General Thomas F. Gioconda, USAF Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/15/2002 DOE Response to Board Letter Dated September 23, 2002, Regarding Fire Protection at the Pantex Plant David E. Beck Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/2/2000 DOE Response to Board Letter in Relation to a More Effective Utilization of the Contractual Arrangements with the Center for Chemical Process Safety and the Institute for Nuclear Power Operations T. J. Glauthier Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/16/2011 DOE Response to Board Letter of April 20, 2011, Concerning the Safety Posture of the Y-12 National Security Complex Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/18/2006 DOE Response to Board Letter of April 24, 2006, Regarding the Methodology for Determining Repackaging Needs and Prioritization of Repacking Nuclear Materials C. Russell H. Shearer Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/7/1999 DOE Response to Board Letter of April 29, 1999, Concerning the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program Failure Data Experience Award Bill Richardson Letter application/pdf iconPDF
9/19/2006 DOE Response to Board Letter of August 16, 2006, re: Operability of Device Assembly Facility Thomas P. D'Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/5/2009 DOE Response to Board Letter of December 16, 2008, Documenting Concerns on Disposition of Findings Resulting from Nuclear Explosive Safety Studies and NES Change Evaluations Thomas P. D' Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/25/2012 DOE Response to Board Letter of December 29, 2011, which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning Activity-Level Work Planning and Control at the Y-12 National Security Complex Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/26/2012 DOE Response to Board Letter of February 28, 2012, which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning the NNSA’s Plans to Review the Accident Analyses, Modify the DSA, and Evaluate the Reliability of Controls for the Annular Core Research Reactor at SNL Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/29/2008 DOE Response to Board Letter of February 6, 2008, Concerning the Need for a Safety-Significant Water Supply for the Highly Enriched Uranium Material Facility Gerald L. Talbot, Jr. Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/15/2008 DOE Response to Board Letter of February 6, 2008, Regarding the Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility Fire Suppression System Robert L. Smolen Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/23/2012 DOE Response to Board Letter of March 2, 2012, Informing the Board that the Requested Update to the Recommendation 2011-1 Implementation Plan (IP) by April 30, 2012, is not Achievable Until Plan Development and Approval Concludes in April 2012 David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/2/2006 DOE Response to Board Letter of March 27, 2006, Regarding Review of the Criticality Experiments Facility (CEF) Project Design Thomas P. D'Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/19/1996 DOE Response to Board Letter of November 15, 1995, re: Board Views Regarding Stabilization of the Mark 16 and 22 Fuels and the Future of the F-Canyon and H-Canyon Chemical Processing Facilities at SRS Hazel R. O'Leary Letter application/pdf iconPDF
10/2/1997 DOE Response to Board Letter of September 17, 1997, on the Safe Restoration of the Plutonium Finishing Plant at the Hanford Site Alvin L. AIm Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/9/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter on Thermal Stabilization Activities in Building 707 at the Rocky Flatz Environmental Technology Site Carolyn L. Huntoon Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/8/2001 DOE Response to Board Letter Regarding Follow-Up Questions from the February 2001 Public Meetings on Integrated Safety Management and Providing the DOE Line Management Chains for the National Nuclear Security Agency and Environmental Management Spencer Abraham Letter application/pdf iconPDF
4/4/2014 DOE Response to Board March 12, 2014, Letter Advising DOE to Thoroughly Evaluate the Ventilation System, Safety Controls and Contingency Plans at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) to Ensure Adequate Protection of the Workers and the Public David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/30/2012 DOE Response to Board March 2, 2012, Letter Regarding the Effectiveness of the Nuclear Explosive Safety (NES) Program at Pantex Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/30/2012 DOE Response to Board March 27, 2012, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning the Review of A- and K-Area Fire Water Supplies, Savannah River Site David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
7/30/2014 DOE response to Board March 31, 2014 letter closing Recommendation 2005-1 and requesting information regarding DOE updated plan and schedule for implementing DOE Manual 441.1-1 and plans for revising DOE Manual 441.1. Ernest J. Moniz Letter application/pdf iconPDF
6/20/2014 DOE Response to Board May 23, 2014, Letter Requesting Evaluation of the Need for an Additional Independent Assessment at the Completion of Startup Testing of the Idaho National Laboratory's Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/19/1996 DOE Response to Board November 15, 1995, Letter on Mark 16 and 22 Fuel at Savannah River Canyons Hazel R. O'Leary Letter application/pdf iconPDF
1/16/2013 DOE Response to Board November 19, 2012, Letter Concerning the Upgrade to the Nuclear Facility Safety Basis for Area G at Los Alamos National Laboratory James J. McConnell Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/3/2012 DOE Response to Board November 7, 2011, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning Nuclear Explosive Safety (NES) Issues at the Pantex Plant, Requesting an Additional 30 Days to Answer Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/6/2012 DOE Response to Board November 7, 2011, Letter which Issued a Reporting Requirement Concerning the Review of the Tracking and Closure Process for Nuclear Explosive Safety (NES) Findings at the Pantex Plant Donald L. Cook Letter application/pdf iconPDF
5/23/1996 DOE Response to Board Observations Concerning the NESS Revalidation Process Thomas P. Seitz Letter application/pdf iconPDF
8/6/2007 DOE Response to Board Observations on the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Mobile Characterization Unit Generic Documented Safety Analysis Paul M. Golan Letter application/pdf iconPDF
3/11/2008 DOE Response to Board October 16, 2007, Letter that Provided a 60 Day Reporting Requirement Addressing Concerns about the Safety of Nuclear Operations at the Los Alamos National Laboratory Thomas P. D'Agostino Letter application/pdf iconPDF
2/5/2014 DOE Response to Board October 23, 2013, Letter Detailing the Program Secretarial Officer's Assessment of the Metrics Used in Performing Line Oversight of Criticality Safety Programs Matthew Moury Letter application/pdf iconPDF
12/9/2011 DOE Response to Board October 6, 2011, Reporting Requirement, enclosing the CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility (WESF) Corrective Action Plan (CAP) David Huizenga Letter application/pdf iconPDF